Motion is one of the fundamental aspects that architecture has to deal with ,both internally as the accommodation of motion as the flux of forces motivating,channeling and restricting patterns and formations that might emerge from different or differential movements.
As architectural space ,when thought as a container,field ,or gradient – to be consumed from within its’ internal entities,it is metaphorically extended as a stage,a backdrop of events to take place within.As a container,architecture becomes the basic form giver to motional patterns which have certain syntactic and semantic values that can be both decoded for the sake of understanding and research ,and encrypted or coded as a physical manifestation of expression or promotion of knowledge.
Motion is defined by displacement and displacement of physical bodies are restricted by built or natural formations.so when the motion around us is investigated it could be seen as the interaction of objects under deflection,modulation and flux with the simultaneity of control objects.As motion is related to reference frames ,the complete reversal of such physical conditions are also possible.It is when rather the architectural bodies are under motion and the objects to be contained does not necessarily require to be in motion.So either the container or the contained can be in a static state while the other can be dynamic,or both can be in a dynamic state , probably to be modified mutually.
In the urban scale architecture tends to be more emphasized as infra-structure in the form of arteries and networks of roads,highways,pavements,drainage systems,power grids and even invisible networks of telecommunications. The very objects that guide the flow of mass and energy creating formations that have profound influence in the city´s circulation,node , mesh works can conversely be affected in micro or macro scale ,resulting in hierarchical systems by the respective immediate architecture and planning.
Besides this very physical and materialistic observation ,the introduction of time and perception adds another dimension to the ‚‘object-displacement-space‘ relationship. This mutual interaction can be extended further on as a cohesive or non cohesive amalgamation of complex interplay of perception –space-object -motion continuum.This quadra-modal interrelation can be explored as perception becomes dynamic and the whole system of subject/object/motion/container interplay gains new degree of conception concerning events and actions. Dessau-2003